The review found a few low-risk but recurring hygiene issues: docs:watch depends on bunx concurrently even though concurrently is not declared in package metadata, and small stale API surface remains after recent refactors, such as unused parameters in field-grouping workflow code. This task should make the developer workflow reproducible and clean up low-risk stale symbols that do not warrant a dedicated architecture task.
Acceptance Criteria
#1 The docs:watch workflow runs through declared project tooling or is rewritten to avoid undeclared dependencies.
#2 Small stale symbols or parameters identified during the review outside the main composition-root cleanup are removed without behavior changes.
#3 Any contributor-facing command changes are reflected in repository documentation.
#4 The cleanup remains scoped to low-risk workflow and hygiene fixes rather than expanding into large architectural refactors.
Implementation Plan
Fix the docs:watch workflow so it relies on declared project tooling or an equivalent checked-in command path.
Clean up low-risk stale symbols surfaced by the review outside the main.ts architecture task, such as unused parameters left behind by refactors.
Keep the task scoped: avoid pulling in main composition-root cleanup or larger Anki/runtime refactors.
Verify the affected developer commands still work and document any usage changes.
